March 24, 2010

Review: Grant Hardy, "Understanding the Book of Mormon: A Reader's Guide"

Title: Understanding the Book of Mormon: A Reader's Guide 
Author: Grant Hardy
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Genre: Religion/Literature
Year: 2010
Pages: 346
ISBN13: 9780199731701
Binding: Hardcover
Price: 29.95 

In one corner Skeptical-Critic shuffles his feet as he knocks his gloves together. In the other corner Believer- Apologist ghosts jabs, bobbing up and down. At the back of the arena Indifferent-Non-believer and Didactic-Believer glance in the direction of the main event, feeling a little out of place. Standing at center ring is the Book of Mormon, America’s most unique and prolific scriptural production. In the middle of this epic bout Grant Hardy calls a timeout with his new book Understanding the Book of Mormon: A Reader’s Guide. He attempts the double-task of convincing non-Mormons that the Book of Mormon is worth the effort of serious analysis while convincing Mormons that searching their sacred book can yield more than didactic homilies or proofs of ancient authenticity. Granting the importance of the main event, he offers a different venue altogether.

Hardy appreciates the difficulty of speaking to such disparate groups, sensing that many believers and non tend to “misrepresent or distort what the book actually says” by mining evidence from the text to support their respective positions. Critics like Dan Vogel have offered unique readings to reveal the book as a 19th-century fiction (overlooking striking parallels for weaker guesses). Believers like Richard Rust have pointed to its structure and voices, depicting it as inspired literature (missing much of the awkwardness that outsiders are confronted with in the book). Hardy believes such studies can “miss much of what makes the book both coherent and unique” (xii-xviii). He wants to offer something new:
There has never been a detailed guide to the contents of the Book of Mormon that meets the needs of both Latter-day Saints and outsiders, undoubtedly because they come to the text with such different perspectives and expectations. In this study I suggest the Book of Mormon can be read as literature—a genre that encompasses history, fiction, and scripture—by anyone trying to understand this odd but fascinating book…. [M]y goal is to help anyone interested in the Book of Mormon, for whatever reason, become a better, more perceptive reader (xiv, xvi).
Audaciously titled, this reader’s guide is not merely a synopsis of the Book of Mormon’s main characters, events and themes. It is an effort to help make sense of what one very early reviewer of the Book of Mormon called “mostly a blind mass of words, interwoven with scriptural language and quotations, without much of a leading plan or design” (xiv). Hardy realized the short-sightedness of such an evaluation while editing a “reader’s edition” of the Book of Mormon.1 Distinct patterns and styles emerged from the narrators of the book. Now, using the tools of literary analysis, Hardy seeks to demonstrate a method of reading that will help readers make better sense of the intersecting plots and strategies of Nephi, Mormon, and Moroni—the book’s main editor/narrators. A close reading illuminates key meanings in the text, and the literary identity of each narrator is manifest not only in what they say, but how they say it (266).2

The Book of Mormon's complexity, (considering the apparent circumstances of its production with Joseph Smith dictating the text to scribes one time through) may give a little more weight to Smith’s claims of angels and divine assistance. At the very least, Hardy argues, its complexity strongly signals deliberate design and careful construction. But Hardy is not making the argument that "Joseph Smith could not have written this book.” He believes the “parallels and allusions in the Book of Mormon are deliberate and meaningful rather than coincidental,” but freely acknowledges that “literary analysis does not compel belief” (xvii). 

By reading closely, Hardy guides readers through novel readings not found in other studies of the Book of Mormon. For instance, he observes that “Alma or Mormon (or Joseph Smith) has structured the first two-thirds of the book of Alma according to a series of parallels” (304). Alma 4-16 includes three sermons delivered to three different cities. Alma 36-42 includes Alma’s three charges to three different sons (Alma 36-42). The sermons and charges overlap in theme, respective length, order, and source (primary documents are utilized in each case). This city/son parallel is even more interesting considering Alma preached in five cities but only three accounts are included in the narrative. Altogether, this indicates remarkable coincidence or deliberate construction: Zarahemla/Helaman (morally ambiguous), Gideon/Shiblon (clearly righteous, shortest), Ammonihah/Corianton (clearly wicked, longest).

Impressively, Hardy’s book is so full of detailed analysis that this particular discovery in Alma is actually relegated to a footnote! Overall, the book follows the structure of the Book of Mormon itself tracing the styles and stories of each narrator, as well as the gaps they leave for perceptive readers to fill in. Not only does this allow Hardy to present an overview of the entire Book of Mormon, it also places some of his most powerful chapter parallels in the “3 Nephi 11” spot, which Hardy argues was deliberately situated within the structure of the Book of Mormon to properly emphasize Christ’s visit to the Nephites (267). Without calling attention to it, Hardy's book seems to enact what it demonstrates from the Book of Mormon itself (258-60).3

At times Hardy moves quickly through bits of the Book of Mormon. His tracing of its complexity may lose outsiders who aren’t as familiar with Lehi’s vision of the tree, or the Nephite monetary system, or other (relatively incidental) details. Similarly, some Latter-day Saints may feel slightly disoriented with occasional  technical jargon. These difficulties are explained by Hardy's desire to reach a broad audience. The book invites critics to attempt a “willing suspension of disbelief” so they might see more fruitful readings despite doubts of authorship. Latter-day Saints, he adds, may need a “willing suspension of belief, that is, to think of the Book of Mormon as a work of literature, with an emphasis on its creativity and artifice” as opposed to proofs of ancient origin or teachings for our times (28).4 Latter-day Saint readers will enjoy fresh approaches to the narrator's uses of King James phrases (255), Mormon's editorial interruptions (97-102), Captain Moroni's apparent character flaws (174) and many, many other things. (I wished for a more extended discussion of King Benjamin's sermon and its impact on the remaining record.)

This book makes a strong case that when examined closely, the Book of Mormon "exhibits a literary exuberance that frustrates quick judgments and reductive analysis" (267). By shifting “attention away from Joseph Smith and back to the Book of Mormon itself, a common discourse becomes possible" through literary analysis (xvi). Readers who try to play by Hardy’s rules will be richly rewarded. It will change the way you read the Book of Mormon forever.  A Reader's Guide is a knockout punch in ink and paper; I can't recommend it enough.

Grant Hardy, The Book of Mormon: A Reader’s Edition, University of Illinois Press (2005). Hardy is well-attuned to the aesthetics of book reading. His Reader's Edition aims to make the book more comfortable to read, using better formatting, size, new punctuation, charts and tables, headings, and other devices to increase readability. Right down to the layout of the print on a page, Hardy recognizes the power a physical book can wield: “Perhaps because they most often encounter the Book of Mormon in a verse-by-verse format, [Latter-day Saints] rarely read in terms of large-scale narrative contexts or weigh the parts against the whole” (xix). Reader's Guide and Reader's Edition both aim to increase readability of the Book of Mormon. I hope do do some blog posts on more specific points than can be addressed in a short review, this book is stuffed full of insight.

Because Hardy adopts the “internal perspective” of the book he “write[s] about the narrators as if they were actual people with complex motivations and developing understandings.” Non-believers “are welcome to place virtual quotation marks around the names Nephi and Mormon whenever they appear in the chapters that follow” (xvii-xvii).

A similar point about the structure of the book has been made in Brant Gardner's "Mormon's Editorial Method and Meta-Message," FARMS Review, 21:1, 83-105. Hardy interacts with (and sometimes counters) many LDS scholars, including John Welch and others, in the footnotes (see 248, 297, 301, 303, 313 for examples). Even The Book of Mormon Movie gets a shout-out, however unsympathetic (312).

Those interested in the Book of Mormon debates aren’t too far from Hardy’s mind. He includes enough information for believers and skeptics (citing many of the most substantive positions and publications) throughout the footnotes.


See the limited Google preview here.


Introduction, xi
Abbreviations, xxi

1.    A Brief Overview (Narrator-based Reading), 3

Part I: Nephi
2.    Sons and Brothers (Characterization), 31
3.    Prophets of Old (Scriptural Interpretation), 58

Part II: Mormon
4.    Mormon’s Dilemma (Competing Agendas), 89
5.    Other Voices (Embedded Documents), 121
6.    Providential Recurrence (Parallel Narratives), 152
7.    The Day of the Lord’s Coming (Prophecy and Fulfillment), 180

Part III: Moroni
8.    Weakness in Writing (A Sense of Audience), 217
9.    Strategies of Conclusion (allusion), 248

Afterward, 268
Index, 328
Scripture Index, 338


BHodges said...

difficult to review, too much good stuff

Ardis said...

Difficult? But what a colorful way of opening your review to frame the who and what and why of this book's audience!

Kevin Barney said...

Nice review, Blair. Thanks.

Peregos said...

Where is the "I LIKE" button?

Edje said...

Great review.

Ryan T. Roos said...

Great review, Blair. This was one of those new releases that I was on the fence about. Very helpful. :)

Anonymous said...

I wrote 8 paragraphs and then deleted them because it was all sermonizing. LOL

Nice review.


BHodges said...

pfff. post your thoughts sione, come on!

Clean Cut said...

Wow--impressive stuff. Thanks for the review!

BHodges said...

Parenthetically, I wanted to include this quote in the review, but thought better of it due to length. This is from a book review Louis Midgley wrote along ago in a galaxy far away. It describes the virtual opposite of what Hardy's book does:

The flaws in [this particular BoM commentary] are ones common to much of Mormon scholarship. The tendency is to divert attention away from the message and meaning in the text under consideration, and back towards what we already know. Such efforts do not enhance our understanding; they tend to make the very teachings they celebrate seem merely sentimental and insubstantial. Such endeavors also tend to close the door on the untapped possibilities within the scriptures. Our tendency is to rely upon presumably authoritative statements on matters that may seem urgent to us, but which may not have been of concern to those responsible for providing us with the Book of Mormon. These secondary materials may be edifying or at least harmless, but are quite often of limited value, being themselves flawed by the kind of neglect of the enigmatic and yet fruitful particulars found in the Book of Mormon that has brought the Church under divine condemnation. Part of the neglect of the Book of Mormon and the resulting censure (D&C 84:54-57) may be traced to our urge to advance seemingly authoritative answers to questions that are not addressed in that text. (Midgley, "Prophetic Messages or Dogmatic Theology? Commenting on the Book of Mormon: A Review Essay," FARMS Review 1:1, 92-113).

Sam B. said...

Great, thanks. This is just what I needed: another book to put on my reading queue!

(But in all seriousness, thanks for the review--this sounds great.)

BHodges said...

I should note that a non-LDS scholar earlier wrote of the possibility for a work like Hardy's. He notes the different ways one can evaluate a text, including the historical-critical analysis that Hardy tends to bracket, and the literary analysis which Hardy makes. (Although some have objected that there isn't true "bracketing" of the historicity of the BoM I think Hardy does as well as he can in allowing readers the option of believing in a "real" Nephi or Mormon.) Massimo Introvigne writes:

Within these limits it seems that rhetoric, narrative, and semiotic analysis of the Book of Mormon (some examples have been produced by the faculty at Brigham Young University and by FARMS itself) could be useful to develop a better understanding of the Book of Mormon as a text, without being immediately drawn to historical-critical problems.

See "The Book of Mormon Wars: A Non-Mormon Perspective," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 5:2, pp. 1-25.

Mushtaq ahmed said...

activate axis bank mobile banking
activate andhra bank mobile baking
activate canara bank mobile banking
activate corporation bank mobile banking
activate syndicate bank mobile banking
activate central bank mobile banking
activate dena bank mobile banking
activate union bank mobile banking
activate yes bank mobile banking
activate uco bank mobile banking
activate obc mobile banking
activate vijaya bank mobile banking
activate idbi mobile banking
activate citi bank mobile banking
activate kotak mobile banking
hdfc net banking
icici net banking
axis net banking
andhra net banking
canara net banking
corporation net banking
syndicate net banking
central bank net banking
dena bank net banking
union bank net banking
yes bank net banking
uco bank net banking
obc net banking
vijaya bank net banking
idbi bank net banking
citi bank net banking
bob net banking
kotak net banking

Mushtaq ahmed said...

hdfc loan against securities interest rates

Mushtaq ahmed said...

bobibanking login

Post a Comment

All views are welcome when shared respectfully. Use a name or consistent pseudonym rather than "anonymous." Deletions of inflammatory posts will be noted. Thanks for joining the conversation.