October 10, 2008

Reading With New Eyes

Likening With Care, Part 12
Take a quick look at this old FedEx logo. You've probably seen it hundreds of times, blue and orange; a shortened way of saying Federal Express. But there is more to this logo than first meets the eye.

About 18 years ago the FARMS Review published a review of Joseph Fielding McConkie and Robert Millet's commentary on the Book of Mormon. The reviewer described what he felt was lacking in the commentary's overall approach:
My view is that [the authors] would have been more successful if they had been less concerned that the reader be coached on correct versions of what a Mormon ought to believe on a host of matters, and more concerned about attempting to get clear on the beliefs, practices, and understandings of divine things in the world called forth by the text, which necessarily includes much more than a collection of precise little doctrinal assertions or allusions, always seen through the lens of how we currently tend to understand such things.1
Just such an attempt as Midgley desired can be seen throughout Gardner's new Book of Mormon commentary, Second Witness. Gardner attempts to draw meaning from the text rather than constructing a theology into it from current LDS understanding. Thus, even when a reader disagrees with Gardner's hypothesis, he has likely highlighted something the reader has missed before, making them think about it in a new way. The commentary is most effective because the Book of Mormon becomes true for its own sake, for those who lived in the past, in addition to how it interacts with current LDS thought.

Take, for example, Gardner's discussion of Alma's baptizing himself in Mosiah 18. Most commentaries have attempted to present this baptism as somehow equal to baptism in the Church today, thus issues of priesthood authority and correct administration of the rite are the fundamental questions to be answered. Thus Gardner cites Joseph Fielding Smith and Daniel Ludlow, who both approached the verses in that way, though neither claimed their views could definitively be solved by an appeal to the text only.2 He brings in a newer (and he believes better) take on the baptism, however:
First, we should clearly understand what Alma is doing. He introduces baptism to his believers. Because it is called "baptism" it is very easy to presume that we know exactly what the idea meant in this ancient context. That would be too simple. First, we must remember that the conception of a whole-body washing for personal purity was long a part of Israelite religion. The miqveh was a rite of washing for the cleansing of the person. It is probably this native Jewish rite that John the Baptists expands into his baptism...3
He continues, citing others who have discussed similar possibilities. The key is that Alma's baptism takes on a deeper meaning when Gardner attempts to situate it in the larger culture of the Book of Mormon peoples rather than imposing a current understanding of baptism back into the text. Introducing the concept of the miqveh rite brings a new view to the text, a possible concept that was always there but wasn't necessarily seen.

These verses can still be likened unto our day, but they also have more internal significance; Alma is a real person performing a real rite that isn't equal to what we do today but held a similar important significance. The text becomes new. Think of the FedEx logo above. Again, you've seen it a hundred times, but when someone points out the subtle message of speed, efficiency, and movement embedded in the logo signified by a hidden arrow, it becomes new. Did you ever see it before?


Now that you've seen it there it becomes easier to see it again elsewhere:


There are good things to be said for likening in the traditional sense of simply applying verses to our day.4 Latter-day Saints read the scriptures in order to find current value therein, and can assuredly do so without noticing many of the nuances or alternate interpretations. Still, these efforts can also wind up "divert[ing] attention away from the message and meaning in the text under consideration, back towards what we already know."5 Gardner seeks to find deep meaning in the Book of Mormon and whether readers agree with his analysis or not, his work remains valuable if for nothing other than making the reader do so likewise.


_________________________________________________

I'd like to thank Brant Gardner for participating in the series "Likening With Care." His commentary can be purchased here. An older pre-publication version of the commentary is available here.




FOOTNOTES:
[1]
See Louis Midgley, "Prophetic Messages or Dogmatic Theology? Commenting on the Book of Mormon: A Review Essay (A review of "Doctrinal Commentary on the Book of Mormon: Volume I, Volume II" by Joseph Fielding McConkie and Robert L. Millet)," FARMS Review 1:1 (1989).

[2]
Joseph Fielding Smith wrote of the ordinance: "We may conclude that Alma held the priesthood before he, with others, became disturbed with King Noah. Whether this is so or not makes no difference because in the Book of Mosiah it is stated definitely that he had authority…"(Smith, Answers to Gospel Questions, Deseret Book, 1960, v.3, p. 203).

[3]
See Second Witness vol. 3, Mosiah 18, or the online rough draft at Gardner's website here. In his discussion of these verses Gardner also cites Daniel C. Peterson, "Priesthood in Mosiah." The Book of Mormon: Mosiah, Salvation Only Through Christ, Religious Studies Center, BYU, 1991.

[4]
An interesting discussion along these lines from which I drew some of my points occurred on the By Common Consent blog. See Ronan, "Christensen and Midgley on Mormon Pedagogy," Sept. 22, 2008.

[5]
Midgley, opt. cit.

9 comments:

Jacob J said...

Good post. I agree that we have a bad habit of trying to read the Book of Mormon as though all the prophets in there were Latter-day Saints. Examples like this help us to shake that habit.

I would nitpick a little bit in that the example you provide does not actually demonstrate Gardner getting something from the text. Rather, it seems he is trying to situate it in an ancient, rather than a modern context.

I always appreciate examples of getting more out of a closer reading (only) because most of us can aspire to that goal more easily than to the goal of situating the text in an ancient Mesoamerican culture.

BHodges said...

You are a perceptive one, young grasshopper. ;)

Yes, the example could be better. To look further, Gardner is pointing out that the word "baptism" will have different meaning to different people. So in bringing to light the Jewish practice we see how a more ancient concept can be transfered over time, in addition to seeing how the underlying purpose of joining a community or making a covenant remained the same. I vascilitated on what example in the commentary to use, and opted for this one because it was easy to remember where it was, and could be discussed briefly without going into a bunch of detail. Another example I considered was in his discussion of Jacob 2 where wealth and polygamy appear to be interrelated. Gardner (I believe convincingly) argues that a Mesoamerican context would have made the two sins completely related, and would have neatly fit what Jacob was contending against. I didn't want polygamy side-tracks and stuff, though.

Anyway, a good critique on your part, thanks.

Rick said...

Thanks for this series. I have been using the online version for some time, and like it a lot. The printed books are expensive, but I think they are worth the cost.

BHodges said...

I also like using the online version when I need to copy/paste a large section. Like you I also favor having the actual books.

Nathan said...

Yes, that's the very reason I love Gardner's commentary (even though I disagree with several conclusions). He looks at what the text actually says. I was truly heart broken when his commentary was removed from his site; I will never be able to afford the print copies.

BHodges said...

Thanks, I was sad to see it go away too since I used to use it for copy/paste reasons.

Ranveer Patil said...

This is great do you have a catologue if so I would love one to share with friends and family.
ipl 2016 live matches watch online here
watch cricket stream on cricbuzz ipl matches
ipl live streaming 2016 score watch online

OnlineMoney Booster said...

T20 World cup 2016 Live Streaming
icc t20 wc live score
World T20 2016 Match Schedule
India vs Pakistan World T20 live score
India vs Australia t20 World Cup 2016 live score
Ipl T20 2016 Schedule
Budget Hotels in Delhi
Iindia vs South Africa T20 world Cup 2016 live

Happy Mothers day 2016 sayings said...

top mothers day wishes 2016 ||
top 20 mothers day wishes 2016 ||

and

Mothers day 2016 FB Status ||
Mothers day 2016 Facebook Status ||
happy Mothers day 2016 FB Status ||

happy Mothers day 2016 Facebook Status ||

and

mothers day wishes 2016 in Hindi ||
happy mothers day wishes 2016 in Hindi ||
top mothers day wishes 2016 in Hindi ||


and

mothers day wishes from daughter 2016 ||
happy mothers day wishes from daughter 2016 ||
mothers day 2016 from daughter ||
happy mothers day 2016 from daughter ||

and

funny mothers day wishes 2016 ||
Top funny mothers day wishes 2016 ||
best funny mothers day wishes 2016 ||

and

mothers day wishes to Friend mom 2016 ||
mothers day wishes 2016 Friend mom ||
Top mothers day wishes to Friend mom 2016 ||

best mothers day wishes to Friend mom ||

and

mothers day wishes 2016 from son ||
happy mothers day wishes 2016 from son ||

top mothers day wishes 2016 from son ||

best mothers day wishes 2016 from son ||

Post a Comment

All views are welcome when shared respectfully. Use a name or consistent pseudonym rather than "anonymous." Deletions of inflammatory posts will be noted. Thanks for joining the conversation.