February 8, 2008

Becoming Saints before gods

Heber C. Kimball
June 29, 1856

Much criticism of Joseph Smith and the LDS Church in general stems from the doctrine regarding the eternal potential of mankind. The Church believes that men and women are the "offspring" of Heavenly Parents (see Acts 17:28-29) composed of the same eternal substance (see D&C 93:33-35), and as such, have divine possibilities. However, there are many names for and many interpretations of the doctrine in and out of the Church. Describing the various schools of thought on the subject is not the purpose of this post, however.[1] In this discourse, President Heber C. Kimball tangentially referred to deification, not as a glorious declaration that we can become gods, or godlike, but to remind his listeners not to put the cart before the horse; we ought to consider becoming true Saints before focusing too much on being gods:

Many think that they are going right into the celestial kingdom of God, in their present ignorance, to at once receive glories and powers; that they are going to be Gods, while many of them are so ignorant, that they can see or know scarcely anything. Such people talk of becoming Gods, when they do not know anything of God, or of His works; such persons have to learn repentance, and obedience to the law of God; they have got to learn to understand angels, and to comprehend and stick to the principles of this Church.
…I bear testimony of this, and I wish you would listen to counsel and lay aside every sin that doth so easily beset you, and turn to the Lord with full purpose of heart.

Similarly, during the King Follett discourse, Joseph Smith taught:
When you climb up a ladder, you must begin at the bottom, and ascend step by step, until you arrive at the top; and so it is with the principles of the Gospel--you must begin with the first, and go on until you learn all the principles of exaltation. But it will be a great while after you have passed through the veil [died] before you will have learned them. It is not all to be comprehended in this world; it will be a great work to learn our salvation and exaltation even beyond the grave (History of the Church, 6:306–7).
Christ said "be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father in Heaven is perfect" (see Matthew 5:48) and Mormons tend take that charge literally; perhaps sometimes a little too literally for the time being. The trouble is, some Saints might feel they can, or even must achieve this impossible goal through their own efforts. In conversations about grace and works Mormons are quick to quote: "faith without works is dead," (see James 2:20). We would do well to remember that works without faith is also dead, and I believe Heber is trying in the discourse to express that message.

Here we see an early example of a Church leader expressing grace, though he still maintains a "work-heavy" perspective. It is for us, today, to focus on today, and retain a remission of sins relying on Christ, as the light grows brighter and brighter until the perfect day. In the meantime, probation continues, and Heber has a few pieces of advice to impart:
We cannot become perfect, without we are assisted by our heavenly Father. We must be faithful and of one heart, and one mind, and let every man and woman take course to build up and not pull down. See that you save your grain, that you may save yourselves from the wicked of the world. Try to take care of every thing that is good to eat, for this is the work of the Lord God Almighty, and we shall have times that will test the integrity of this people, that will test who is honest and who is not.
Omitting prayer is calculated to lead the mind away from those duties which are incumbent upon us; then let us attend to our prayers and all our duties, and you will know that brother Brigham and his brethren have told you of these things...

There are trying times ahead of you, do you not begin to feel and see them? If you do not, I say you are asleep. I wish that the spirit which rests upon a few individuals could be upon you, everyone of you, it would be one of the most joyful times that brother Brigham and I ever saw with the Saints of God upon this earth.

We have enough on our plates to worry about today without being presumptuous about our future estate. Certainly we can have the end in mind, remembering the relationship of Father to child is crucial. He will always, through all eternity, be our Father and our God. Still, it would be unwise to jump the gun and assume we are practically almost there; we have plenty to do in the meantime.
We believe we can become gods, but can that belief interfere with our probation?


Footnotes:  

[1]  
"Do Mormons believe they can become Gods" is a question that requires much more than a yes or no answer, to be sure. When members of the Church are reluctant to answer with "yes" or "no", they may seem to be trying to hide something, or to be unversed on the subject. This circumstance was reflected in an oft-cited response by President Hinckley in several interviews. Pres. Hinckley has been accused of being dishonest or evasive on the subject of deification; whether we can become gods. He is depicted by critics as saying something to the effect of "we don't know anything about that." Actually, Pres. Hinckley was saying we don't know much about Heavenly Father's past. Here is the selection from the interview in the San Fransisco Gate, wherein Pres. Hinckley affirms the divine potential of men and women:
Q: There are some significant differences in your beliefs. For instance, don't Mormons believe that God was once a man?
A: I wouldn't say that. There was a little couplet coined, "As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.'' Now that's more of a couplet than anything else. That gets into some pretty deep theology that we don't know very much about.
Q: So you're saying the church is still struggling to understand this?
A: Well, as God is, man may become. We believe in eternal progression. Very strongly. We believe that the glory of God is intelligence and whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the Resurrection. Knowledge, learning, is an eternal thing. And for that reason, we stress education. We're trying to do all we can to make of our people the ablest, best, brightest people that we can.
And from TIME Magazine:
Q: ... about that, God the Father was once a man as we were. This is something that Christian writers are always addressing. Is this the teaching of the church today, that God the Father was once a man like we are?
A: I don’t know that we teach it. I don’t know that we emphasize it. I haven’t heard it discussed for a long time in public discourse. I don’t know. I don’t know all the circumstances under which that statement was made. I understand the philosophical background behind it. But I don’t know a lot about it and I don’t know that others know a lot about it.
For more on the issue, see FAIR's article Does President Hinckley Understand LDS Doctrine? and for more on deification, see FAIR, "Deification of man." (See especially the references they cite.) See also Robert L. Millet, Noel B. Reynolds, "Do Latter-day Saints believe that men and women can become gods?" Latter-day Christianity: 10 Basic Issues. Theosis as understood by the Orthodox Church has differing distinctions as to what godhood means. See the wikipedia article on theosis. Finally, Pres. Hinckley may be much closer to the truth than Latter-day Saints who affirm an eternal regression of gods. Blake Ostler makes the argument that God the Father is literally the Most High God. See his chapter "God the Eternal Father" in Exploring Mormon Thought Vol. 2: The Problems of Theism and the Love of God, Kofford Books. 

3 comments:

Ronnie Bray said...

Saints before Gods

I am in lock-step with HCK's statement about becoming saints before becoming gods. I do not consider this remark deeply doctrinal but rather pabulum aimed at members of the Church - note my avoidance of the word 'saint' at this juncture - that think entry into the baptismal font qualifies them for exaltation. I can see Heber's finger wagging in their direction, and rightly so if their view of discipleship really is that simplistic.

I reflect on the words of Saint Paul to the saints at Philippi [2:12-13]:

“Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.”

In these two verses Paul identifies the nature of covenant in which the conditions of exaltation are set out without the detailed matter so beloved by theologians. The nature of this covenant is that of shared interest in the outcome, and the notification of shared activity on the parts of the Party of the First Part who is Almighty God, and the Party of the Second Part who is the candidate for exaltation.

So, what is a 'saint'? Clearly, a saint, whether ancient, meridianal, or of this dispensation is one that has voluntarily entered into covenant relationship with God in order to receive the highest blessings at the expense Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ’ and of conforming their lives to Christ's model of perfection 'to the best of their several abilities.'

Perfection is not a gift that God pours out onto the head of the legalistically perfect. Were it so, then only Jesus would be exalted and he would be the sole recipient of 'all that the Father hath.' But the saints that are as faithful as they can be become 'Joint heirs with Christ of all that the Father has.'

Therefore, every one that is 'or can be called [a] saint' is a candidate to enter into God's rest and sit down on His throne, being exalted to godhood.

All that is required for an individual to become a member of The Church of Jesus Christ are a few statements of basic belief. Fortunately, there is no formal examination of theological, Christological, or ecclesiological understanding. If there were then Jesus would never have been able to found his Church during his mortal ministry, and every Patriarch, Prophet, and Apostle upon whom the Holy Spirit moved to act would have yielded no fruit.

I see nothing more sinister in Bro Kimball's remarks to members of the Church that could, conceivably, have had a hard time staying alive, but that needed reminding that the race was not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but to him that endures ‘to the end.’

President Hinckley is correct that we do not know the details about how Father in Heaven gained his position. There is speculation oft based on scripture that those of speculative turns of mind have mined for pegs on which to hang their hats. Not a safe way to determine what is not revealed.

However, Augustine [with whom I rarely agree] said: 'God was made man, that man might be made God,' to which I Ignatius': God became man so that man might become a god.

BHodges said...

see the other post here:

http://www.lifeongoldplates.com/2008/05/implicit-confidence-in-god-part-3.html

arunsblog said...

mothers day poems 2016 |

happy mothers day poems 2016 |

best mothers day poems 2016 ||||

mothers day poems from son 2016 |

mothers day poems from son 2016 |

happy mothers day poems from son 2016 |


mothers day poems from daughter 2016 |

happy mothers day poems from daughter 2016 |

mothers day poems from daughter 2016 |



top mothers day poems 2016 |

best mothers day poems 2016 |

top 20 mothers day poems 2016 |


******** Mothers day greetings********

Happy Mothers Day Greetings 2016 |
Top Mothers Day Greetings 2016 |
Mothers Day Greetings 2016 |

funny mothers day greetings 2016 |
best mothers day greetings 2016

****Mothers day sayings 2016********

Mothers Day Sayings 2016 ||

Happy Mothers Day Sayings 2016 ||

Top Mothers Day Sayings 2016 |

funny mothers day sayings 2016 and
mothers day sayings 2016 from son |
mothers day sayings 2016 from daughter |
happy mothers day sayings 2016 from son |
happy mothers day sayings 2016 from daughter

Post a Comment

All views are welcome when shared respectfully. Use a name or consistent pseudonym rather than "anonymous." Deletions of inflammatory posts will be noted. Thanks for joining the conversation.